The self-cost method vs. the contribution method – an in-depth guide to choosing the right calculation method

Created December 2025, Reading time: approx. 2-3 minutes

Costing is one of the most important processes in any construction or civil engineering company. Correct costing provides a better basis for decision-making, ensures profitability and reduces risk. Incorrect costing, on the other hand, can lead to underpricing, cost overruns and weak finances. The first choice a coster must make is which method to use: the contribution method or the cost method. Although both can provide a correct result, they require different levels of detail and provide different levels of control. In this support article, you will get a thorough introduction to how the methods work, their strengths and weaknesses, and in which situations each method is appropriate.


What the contribution method actually is

The contribution method – or contribution margin method – focuses only on direct costs. This means that all fixed and indirect costs are “collected” in the contribution margin. This makes the method quick and easy, but also less accurate. For example, as a cost accountant, you must assess yourself how large the contribution margin should be to cover overhead and profit. Many companies use standardized markups, but in practice indirect costs vary from project to project. Lack of understanding of this can lead to margin pressure or losses.

Typical applications

  • Service assignments

  • Minor carpentry, plumbing or electrical jobs

  • Assignments where the customer needs a quick quote

  • Works with low risk or few unknown factors

Common pitfalls

  • Lack of consideration for cars, administration, tools and time spent off the construction site

  • Too low markups in competitive situations

  • Underestimating risk when the job is not as easy as initially thought

3. The self-catering method in practice

The cost-effectiveness method takes into account the entire cost picture before setting a price. This provides much better control, and in larger projects it is absolutely necessary. Many building owners – especially public ones – expect the contractor to be able to document all calculation assumptions. Therefore, the cost-effectiveness method is not only a recommendation, but often a requirement.

Typical costs included

  • Direct costs (materials, hours, UE)

  • Indirect costs (administration, project management, computer systems, tools, car, rig and operation)

  • Risk adjustment

  • Profit

The cost-per-project method is time-consuming, but provides a much more robust basis for understanding a project's finances. It is especially important in projects with many subcontractors and complex interfaces.

4. Comparison of the methods

Criterion The contribution method The self-catering method
Accuracy Medium High
Risk control Low High
Time usage Low High
Documentation requirements Low Loud
Recommended in larger projects No Yes
Suitable for small service jobs Yes Partial

5. When should you use which method?

You should use the contribution method when:

  • The mission is small and clear.

  • price must be given quickly

  • risk is low and the quantities are easy to calculate

  • you know the customer well and have experience with similar jobs

You should use the self-cost method when:

  • the project has uncertainty or many subjects

  • it is a form of contract with reporting or documentation requirements

  • offers must be submitted in public tender

  • the assignment requires detailed project management and coordination

6. Consequences of the wrong method

Using the contribution method on a large, complex project is a common reason why contractors lose money. Conversely, using the cost method on simple jobs can make the company less efficient and increase time unnecessarily. The key is to choose a method based on risk – not habit.


Both methods have their place. The contribution method is perfect for small jobs, but too weak for larger projects. The cost-effective method provides control, security and professionalism – and is therefore the industry standard in projects where documentation, risk and finances play a greater role.

Do you need help with calculations?

We offer a solution that streamlines and simplifies the calculation process in construction projects. Book a free demo or get a no-obligation quote:

Read more about our calculation tool here!

Try out the system, avoid mistakes!

Contact us:

Previous
Previous

Direct and indirect costs – that's why the margin is falling

Next
Next

Common calculation mistakes – and how to avoid them